[GH-ISSUE #298] Ideas of things to implement on Upsilon and errors #128

New issue

Open

opened 2026-05-06 13:15:37 +02:00 by BreizhHardware · 5 comments

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 13:15:37 +02:00

Owner

Originally created by @theodorechle on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/UpsilonNumworks/Upsilon/issues/298

a file manager and the possibility to give any extension you want for a file
a way to add files on the reader app directly on the calculator
formulas like for volumes of geometrical forms
in python app, you can't see all the parameters to enter in the draw_string function in kandinsky and the fill_polygon function is automatically created with 4 parameters to enter but there is only two
add the possibility to write in italic with the draw_string function in python
add a character table
A way to get docstrings in python and inputs/outputs of functions (.doc, help)
The possibility to change the color of the displayed str with a (r,g,b) argument (and hexadecimal str) for prints (maybe a new special print function)

Originally created by @theodorechle on GitHub (Nov 9, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/UpsilonNumworks/Upsilon/issues/298 - [ ] a file manager and the possibility to give any extension you want for a file - [ ] a way to add files on the reader app directly on the calculator - [ ] formulas like for volumes of geometrical forms - [ ] in python app, you can't see all the parameters to enter in the draw_string function in kandinsky and the fill_polygon function is automatically created with 4 parameters to enter but there is only two - [x] add the possibility to write in italic with the draw_string function in python - [ ] add a character table - [ ] A way to get docstrings in python and inputs/outputs of functions (.__doc__, help) - [ ] The possibility to change the color of the displayed str with a (r,g,b) argument (and hexadecimal str) for prints (maybe a new special print function)

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 13:15:38 +02:00

Author

Owner

@lolocomotive commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2023):

3 and 5 are interesting. I think 5 shouldn't be too hard to implement

@lolocomotive commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2023): 3 and 5 are interesting. I think 5 shouldn't be too hard to implement

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 13:15:38 +02:00

Author

Owner

@theodorechle commented on GitHub (Jan 14, 2023):

Cool !

@theodorechle commented on GitHub (Jan 14, 2023): Cool !

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 13:15:38 +02:00

Author

Owner

@Overengined commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2023):

3 would collide with exam protocols in France I think, so better to have the formulas removed in exam mode.

@Overengined commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2023): 3 would collide with exam protocols in France I think, so better to have the formulas removed in exam mode.

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 13:15:38 +02:00

Author

Owner

@theodorechle commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2023):

Yes, I forget that but I think since they are implemented this will be not really hard to block them.

@theodorechle commented on GitHub (Mar 5, 2023): Yes, I forget that but I think since they are implemented this will be not really hard to block them.

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 13:15:38 +02:00

Author

Owner

@NowanPython commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2023):

I like all the ideas 👍

@NowanPython commented on GitHub (Mar 30, 2023): I like all the ideas :+1: