starred/bambuddy-maziggy-1

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git synced 2026-05-09 08:25:54 +02:00

[GH-ISSUE #28] [Feature]: User Management to protect the site with a password #5

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-05-07 00:04:59 +02:00 by BreizhHardware · 3 comments

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:04:59 +02:00

Owner

Originally created by @VID-PRO on GitHub (Dec 22, 2025).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/28

Originally assigned to: @maziggy on GitHub.

Problem or Use Case

Add am user management to protect the site.
I would like to put the site online to get access to my printer from everywhere without using a vpn.
Bute it needs to be password protected for that use case.

Proposed Solution

add a user management

Alternatives Considered

No response

Feature Category

Other

Priority

Would improve my workflow

Mockups or Examples

No response

Contribution

I would be willing to help implement this feature

Checklist

I have searched existing issues to ensure this feature hasn't already been requested

Originally created by @VID-PRO on GitHub (Dec 22, 2025). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/28 Originally assigned to: @maziggy on GitHub. ### Problem or Use Case Add am user management to protect the site. I would like to put the site online to get access to my printer from everywhere without using a vpn. Bute it needs to be password protected for that use case. ### Proposed Solution add a user management ### Alternatives Considered _No response_ ### Feature Category Other ### Priority Would improve my workflow ### Mockups or Examples _No response_ ### Contribution - [x] I would be willing to help implement this feature ### Checklist - [x] I have searched existing issues to ensure this feature hasn't already been requested

BreizhHardware

2026-05-07 00:04:59 +02:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement
label

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:05:00 +02:00

Author

Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2025):

Are you talking about multi user auth with permission management, or about basic user auth? If the latter, I would suggest to use a webserver like Nginx and use basic HTTP authentication.

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2025): Are you talking about multi user auth with permission management, or about basic user auth? If the latter, I would suggest to use a webserver like Nginx and use basic HTTP authentication.

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:05:00 +02:00

Author

Owner

@VID-PRO commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2025):

basic auth will do most of it.
will configure my nginx to do it.

@VID-PRO commented on GitHub (Dec 22, 2025): basic auth will do most of it. will configure my nginx to do it.

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:05:00 +02:00

Author

Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2026):

FYI

Complete user/group authentication is available in branch feature/auth_details. I've tested it roughly. Please chekc and let me know if it works for you.

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Jan 31, 2026): FYI Complete user/group authentication is available in branch feature/auth_details. I've tested it roughly. Please chekc and let me know if it works for you.

BreizhHardware referenced this issue

2026-05-07 00:14:50 +02:00

[PR #5] [MERGED] Fixed websocket bug #894