mirror of
https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git
synced 2026-05-09 08:25:54 +02:00
[GH-ISSUE #827] [Bug]: Wrong filament mapping – dual extruder (H2C) has only one active nozzle #558
Labels
No labels
A1
automated
automated
bug
bug
Closed due to inactivity
contrib
dependencies
dependencies
duplicate
enhancement
feedback
hold
invalid
Notes
P1S
pull-request
security
ThumbsUp
user-report
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/bambuddy-maziggy-1#558
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @behrinml on GitHub (Mar 26, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/827
Originally assigned to: @behrinml on GitHub.
Bug Description
The H2C allows a nozzle size to be selected in the Vortek system that is not available in the left extruder—for example, 0.4 mm on the left and 0.2 mm on the right.
If a print is then started that exclusively uses the corresponding nozzle on the right extruder, a setup is created which erroneously claims that the nozzle in use is the one on the left. This occurs because only one extruder is detected, leading the system to assume the groupID must address that specific one.
Consequently, the filament assignment selected in the slicer cannot be chosen within the UI of Bambuddy.
Happens with docker and git clone, Linux and MacOS
Expected Behavior
The same filament mapping/slot should be possible between Bambuddy and Bambu Studio
Steps to Reproduce
Printer Model
H2C
Bambuddy Version
0.2.2.1
Printer Firmware Version
01.01.05.00
Installation Method
Manual (git clone)
Operating System
macOS
Relevant Logs / Support Package
No response
Screenshots
Same 3mf
Current Bambuddy version. Only AMS A, wrong colors:

Fix (and correct color mapping)

Additional Context
Already fixed, if interested and assigned I happily create the corresponding pull request
Checklist
@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2026):
Why reinventing the wheel? Please open a pull request and note our rules in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Thanks!
@behrinml commented on GitHub (Mar 27, 2026):
Thanks for assigning, I'm going to create the PR on during the weekend after additional tests.
What do you refer to with "the wheel"? Based on the Contributing.md:
"Every contribution starts with an issue. Before writing any code or opening a pull request:
Open a new issue or comment on an existing one describing what you'd like to work on
Wait for agreement — discuss the approach with a maintainer so we're aligned on scope and direction
Get assigned — once we agree, a maintainer will assign the issue to you
Then start coding — only open a PR for an issue that is assigned to you
No assigned issue = no PR. Pull requests without a corresponding assigned issue will be closed."
So I guess, I followed the rules?
@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 28, 2026):
Yes, all is good.