[GH-ISSUE #1101] [Feature]: Support non-dev mode with read-only features #785

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-05-07 00:13:45 +02:00 by BreizhHardware · 1 comment

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:13:45 +02:00

Owner

Originally created by @mailletf on GitHub (Apr 23, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/1101

Originally assigned to: @maziggy on GitHub.

Problem or Use Case

I would be very interested in using all the features of the project that have to do with archiving and cost calculations, etc, but I'm very happy to use bambu's apps to send prints to my A1.

How hard would it be to have a read-only mode that doesn't require to use dev-mode, but only to turn on LAN mode?

Proposed Solution

For each printer that is added, we have a new toggle which would say wether dev-mode is enabled or not. When dev-mode is on, then we get all the write features. If not, then they are disabled in the app for that printer.

Alternatives Considered

No response

Feature Category

Other

Priority

Nice to have

Mockups or Examples

No response

Contribution

I would be willing to help implement this feature

Checklist

I have searched existing issues to ensure this feature hasn't already been requested

Originally created by @mailletf on GitHub (Apr 23, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/1101 Originally assigned to: @maziggy on GitHub. ### Problem or Use Case I would be very interested in using all the features of the project that have to do with archiving and cost calculations, etc, but I'm very happy to use bambu's apps to send prints to my A1. How hard would it be to have a read-only mode that doesn't require to use dev-mode, but only to turn on LAN mode? ### Proposed Solution For each printer that is added, we have a new toggle which would say wether dev-mode is enabled or not. When dev-mode is on, then we get all the write features. If not, then they are disabled in the app for that printer. ### Alternatives Considered _No response_ ### Feature Category Other ### Priority Nice to have ### Mockups or Examples _No response_ ### Contribution - [x] I would be willing to help implement this feature ### Checklist - [x] I have searched existing issues to ensure this feature hasn't already been requested

BreizhHardware

2026-05-07 00:13:45 +02:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement

wontfix
labels

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:13:46 +02:00

Author

Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2026):

You can do so so already without the need for a switch.

BUT!

In the past we've experienced some weird behaviour when developer mode was not enabled. So if you switch it off, then on your own risk and we may refuse issue support.

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Apr 23, 2026): You can do so so already without the need for a switch. BUT! In the past we've experienced some weird behaviour when developer mode was not enabled. So if you switch it off, then on your own risk and we may refuse issue support.

BreizhHardware referenced this issue

2026-05-07 00:16:07 +02:00

[PR #785] [MERGED] v0.2.2.1 #1116

BreizhHardware referenced this issue

2026-05-07 00:16:12 +02:00

[PR #916] [CLOSED] feat: Two-Factor Authentication & OIDC/SSO – full implementation with admin UI #1134