mirror of
https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git
synced 2026-05-09 08:25:54 +02:00
[GH-ISSUE #1214] [Bug]: False-Positive Being Triggered for plate check #881
Labels
No labels
A1
automated
automated
bug
bug
Closed due to inactivity
contrib
dependencies
dependencies
duplicate
enhancement
feedback
hold
invalid
Notes
P1S
pull-request
security
ThumbsUp
user-report
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/bambuddy-maziggy-1#881
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @Forsyth-Creations on GitHub (May 5, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/1214
Originally assigned to: @maziggy on GitHub.
Component
Bambuddy
Bug Description
Hey there! I love Bambuddy, and have recently run into an issue:
The automated plate check seems to be throwing a false positive based on the grey portion of the bed on the right side (For a P1S). Anyway, my calibration could be to blame, but if this is a common issue for others let me know!
Expected Behavior
I would expect that it ignore this region, or not assume that it's a part.
Steps to Reproduce
Printer Model
None
Bambuddy Version
v0.2.3.2
SpoolBuddy Version
NA
Printer Firmware Version
01.10.00.00
Installation Method
Docker
Operating System
Linux (Ubuntu/Debian)
Relevant Logs / Support Package
NA
Screenshots
Additional Context
No response
Checklist
@maziggy commented on GitHub (May 5, 2026):
Yes, unfortunately the detection is not working reliable. Problem is, that the camera is in a fixed position, but the bed can be lowered. Until now we haven't found any reliable solution for this. I'm sorry.
If you find Bambuddy useful, please consider giving it a ⭐ on GitHub — it helps others discover the project!
@Forsyth-Creations commented on GitHub (May 5, 2026):
@maziggy I have some ideas on how to fix this, actually. But it would require an automated calibration process, instead of discrete photos. I'll make a fork and make some updates. Although, I suspect this could be solved temporarily with some dark electrical tape 😂
@maziggy commented on GitHub (May 5, 2026):
If you want to contribute, please note our rules in CONTRIBUTING.md.