mirror of
https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git
synced 2026-05-09 08:25:54 +02:00
[GH-ISSUE #160] [Feature]: Expanded/Wrap File Manager Navigation Folder Names #98
Labels
No labels
A1
automated
automated
bug
bug
Closed due to inactivity
contrib
dependencies
dependencies
duplicate
enhancement
feedback
hold
invalid
Notes
P1S
pull-request
security
ThumbsUp
user-report
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
starred/bambuddy-maziggy-1#98
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally created by @PeterXQChen on GitHub (Jan 26, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/160
Originally assigned to: @maziggy on GitHub.
Problem or Use Case
I have some folders under File Manager that are quite length, I wish we had the ability to make the navigation wider to show more characters OR have the folder names wrap onto the next line.
Proposed Solution
Show more characters OR have the folder names wrap onto the next line.
Alternatives Considered
No response
Feature Category
File Manager
Priority
Nice to have
Mockups or Examples
Contribution
Checklist
@maziggy commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2026):
Fxied in branch 0.1.6-final. Please let now if it works.
@PeterXQChen commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2026):
I see the tooltip.
Did wrapping the name in file manager not look great so you switched to tooltip?
@maziggy commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2026):
Exactly. We could make the two columns resizable.
@PeterXQChen commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2026):
I tested out the wrapping and it doesnt look the best but once I updated "w-64" with "w-84" it looked a lot better, at least on desktop.
Making the 2 columns resizable and text wrapping (potentially a checkbox in settings) would be the best approach I think as this would give the user more control.
@maziggy commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2026):
You forgot to click on " I would be willing to help implement this feature" :)
Added both to branch 0.1.6-final. Please let me know if it works for you.
@PeterXQChen commented on GitHub (Jan 27, 2026):
I'll have to learn the codebase a bit more before I can start contributing :).
Just tested the implementation and its the best of both worlds! Thanks for the speedy implementation and love the project.