[GH-ISSUE #122] add information about UnifiedPush push-gateway #101

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-05-07 00:20:00 +02:00 by BreizhHardware · 4 comments

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:20:00 +02:00

Owner

Originally created by @xundeenergie on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/issues/122

As discussed in the matrix-rooms...

There is a way to "play" your own push-gateway for matrix (schildichat, fluffychat) to use "common-proxies"

this are only a few lines in ntfy's nginx config

  # this sends traffic to common-proxies
  location ~ ^/(FCM|UP|_matrix) {
          proxy_pass                    http://127.0.0.1:5000;
  }

And installing a binary from the link above with a few lines of configuration (add nfty-host) to AllowedHosts list and run it as a service which listens on port 5000.

Then you can use for example (and now only??) matrix with only selfhosted services. matrix->pushgateway->nfty-server->schildi/fluffychat. Not other vendor sees your data!

It's really easy to integrate.

Originally created by @xundeenergie on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/issues/122 As discussed in the matrix-rooms... There is a way to "play" your own push-gateway for matrix (schildichat, fluffychat) to use ["common-proxies"](https://github.com/UnifiedPush/common-proxies) this are only a few lines in ntfy's nginx config ``` # this sends traffic to common-proxies location ~ ^/(FCM|UP|_matrix) { proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:5000; } ``` And installing a binary from the link above with a few lines of configuration (add nfty-host) to AllowedHosts list and run it as a service which listens on port 5000. Then you can use for example (and now only??) matrix with only selfhosted services. matrix->pushgateway->nfty-server->schildi/fluffychat. Not other vendor sees your data! It's really easy to integrate.

BreizhHardware

2026-05-07 00:20:00 +02:00

closed this issue
added the
docs
label

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:20:01 +02:00

Author

Owner

@binwiederhier commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

As @p1gp1g has said in the Discord channel, this is more of a missing piece in the UP docs, though I'm more than willing to add it to an "Integrations" page (when I eventually make that)

@binwiederhier commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): As @p1gp1g has said in the Discord channel, this is more of a missing piece in the UP docs, though I'm more than willing to add it to an "Integrations" page (when I eventually make that)

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:20:01 +02:00

Author

Owner

@karmanyaahm commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

I need to add gateway docs to unifiedpush.org. I don't really think ntfy should integrate the push gateway because the end goal is that push gateways should not be needed at all, they're just a temporary patch.

@karmanyaahm commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): I need to add gateway docs to unifiedpush.org. I don't really think ntfy should integrate the push gateway because the end goal is that push gateways should not be needed at all, they're just a temporary patch.

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:20:01 +02:00

Author

Owner

@binwiederhier commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022):

I don't really think ntfy should integrate the push gateway

Oh I wasn't planning to. I was merely planning to add docs potentially.

@binwiederhier commented on GitHub (Jan 28, 2022): > I don't really think ntfy should integrate the push gateway Oh I wasn't planning to. I was merely planning to add docs potentially.

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:20:01 +02:00

Author

Owner

@binwiederhier commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2022):

I think I'm gonna just close this, as it really seems like this should be in the UnifiedPush docs and not in the ntfy docs. Feel free to re-open if you disagree, but it's probably slightly out of place here.

@binwiederhier commented on GitHub (Mar 16, 2022): I think I'm gonna just close this, as it really seems like this should be in the UnifiedPush docs and not in the ntfy docs. Feel free to re-open if you disagree, but it's probably slightly out of place here.