[GH-ISSUE #1686] Disclose ai usage in readme/documentation (and commit authorship) #1175

New issue

Open

opened 2026-05-07 00:30:50 +02:00 by BreizhHardware · 0 comments

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:30:50 +02:00

Owner

Originally created by @konradmoesch on GitHub (Apr 2, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/issues/1686

The usage of various ai tools is mentioned in the changelog of v2.18.0, which contains huge amounts of changes (over 14k/10k added/removed lines of code).
Please add a disclaimer in the readme and documentation about the usage of ai tools.

Ideally, attribution should also happen at the commit level (co-authorship and attribution are enabled in the default settings, after all) and not hidden, in my opinion. This is not only important for personal preference, but especially important for security, legal and compliance reasons.

Right now, it is unclear (for a user like me) whether 2.18.0 is the first version (co-)authored by claude or whether previous versions also contain ai generated code.

Originally created by @konradmoesch on GitHub (Apr 2, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/binwiederhier/ntfy/issues/1686 The usage of various ai tools is mentioned in the changelog of v2.18.0, which contains huge amounts of changes (over 14k/10k added/removed lines of code). Please add a disclaimer in the readme and documentation about the usage of ai tools. Ideally, attribution should also happen at the commit level (co-authorship and attribution are enabled in the default settings, after all) and not hidden, in my opinion. This is not only important for personal preference, but especially important for security, legal and compliance reasons. Right now, it is unclear (for a user like me) whether 2.18.0 is the first version (co-)authored by claude or whether previous versions also contain ai generated code.