starred/traefik-manager

Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/chr0nzz/traefik-manager.git synced 2026-05-09 05:35:22 +02:00

[GH-ISSUE #3] [feat] Replace `Docker` tab with a more generic `Providers` tab #2

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-05-06 12:22:33 +02:00 by BreizhHardware · 3 comments

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 12:22:33 +02:00

Owner

Originally created by @gadgethm on GitHub (Mar 17, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/chr0nzz/traefik-manager/issues/3

Originally assigned to: @chr0nzz on GitHub.

The Docker tab is very useful for visualizing docker-managed routes. However, Docker isn't the only mechanism by which Traefik can do auto-discovery.

I'd propose you expand the concept from being a tab focused on docker, to being more generic. You could then show the generated paths as being managed by their specific provider, similar to how the built-in traefik dashboard works.

Example providers which are not docker:

Redis
Files which are not managed by traefik-manager
HTTP sources
Kubernetes
Etcd
Consul
And others, see https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/reference/install-configuration/providers/overview/

Originally created by @gadgethm on GitHub (Mar 17, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/chr0nzz/traefik-manager/issues/3 Originally assigned to: @chr0nzz on GitHub. The `Docker` tab is very useful for visualizing docker-managed routes. However, Docker isn't the only mechanism by which Traefik can do auto-discovery. I'd propose you expand the concept from being a tab focused on docker, to being more generic. You could then show the generated paths as being managed by their specific provider, similar to how the built-in traefik dashboard works. Example providers which are not docker: * Redis * Files which are not managed by `traefik-manager` * HTTP sources * Kubernetes * Etcd * Consul * And others, see https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/reference/install-configuration/providers/overview/

BreizhHardware

2026-05-06 12:22:33 +02:00

closed this issue
added the
question
label

BreizhHardware referenced this issue

2026-05-06 12:22:33 +02:00

[GH-ISSUE #2] [feat] Skip setup, auto-generate password #3

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 12:22:34 +02:00

Author

Owner

@chr0nzz commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2026):

I was working on adding individual tabs for each provider.

Its just calling out @docker to pull in information

Let me know if you think its best to have them all in one location rather individual taps as a user needs they enable the provider?

@chr0nzz commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2026): I was working on adding individual tabs for each provider. Its just calling out @docker to pull in information Let me know if you think its best to have them all in one location rather individual taps as a user needs they enable the provider?

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 12:22:34 +02:00

Author

Owner

@gadgethm commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2026):

Could do as separate tabs or combined. Maybe separate does make more sense. Would having it auto-enable tabs based on reading the traefik config file make sense?

@gadgethm commented on GitHub (Mar 17, 2026): Could do as separate tabs or combined. Maybe separate does make more sense. Would having it auto-enable tabs based on reading the traefik config file make sense?

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-06 12:22:34 +02:00

Author

Owner

@chr0nzz commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2026):

latest update adds support to all providers now,

@chr0nzz commented on GitHub (Mar 21, 2026): latest update adds support to all providers now,

No labels

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference

starred/traefik-manager#2

No description provided.

Rows
Columns

[GH-ISSUE #3] [feat] Replace Docker tab with a more generic Providers tab #2

[GH-ISSUE #3] [feat] Replace `Docker` tab with a more generic `Providers` tab #2