[GH-ISSUE #119] Usage of external domain with cloudflared #65

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-05-07 00:18:35 +02:00 by BreizhHardware · 1 comment

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:18:35 +02:00

Owner

Originally created by @stefan-f-punkt on GitHub (Jan 12, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/glenndehaan/unifi-voucher-site/issues/119

Originally assigned to: @glenndehaan on GitHub.

The feature

I tried to add cloudflared to the docker compose file, but I failed.
Maybe it could be possible to Environment variables like external domain and Cloudflare Tunnel Token to the existing config and setup the tunnel directly with the config.

Originally created by @stefan-f-punkt on GitHub (Jan 12, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/glenndehaan/unifi-voucher-site/issues/119 Originally assigned to: @glenndehaan on GitHub. ### The feature I tried to add cloudflared to the docker compose file, but I failed. Maybe it could be possible to Environment variables like external domain and Cloudflare Tunnel Token to the existing config and setup the tunnel directly with the config.

BreizhHardware

2026-05-07 00:18:35 +02:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement
label

BreizhHardware commented

2026-05-07 00:18:36 +02:00

Author

Owner

@glenndehaan commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2026):

Hi @stefan-f-punkt,

I theory it should be possible to connect the app to a cloudflare tunnel. Either via a container with a docker network inbetween, or by installing the tunnel on the host system and then opening the port from the container to the host.

However including the entire cloudflare tunnel as a dependency of this project seems weird to me. Because the next person might want to use tailscale or wireguard. It would not make sense for me to include these as dependencies of this project, as these are infrastructure problems.

Kind regards,
Glenn de Haan

@glenndehaan commented on GitHub (Jan 13, 2026): Hi @stefan-f-punkt, I theory it should be possible to connect the app to a cloudflare tunnel. Either via a container with a docker network inbetween, or by installing the tunnel on the host system and then opening the port from the container to the host. However including the entire cloudflare tunnel as a dependency of this project seems weird to me. Because the next person might want to use tailscale or wireguard. It would not make sense for me to include these as dependencies of this project, as these are infrastructure problems. Kind regards, Glenn de Haan

BreizhHardware referenced this issue

2026-05-07 00:18:56 +02:00

[PR #65] [MERGED] New Crowdin updates #106