1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy.git synced 2026-05-09 08:25:54 +02:00

[GH-ISSUE #564] [Bug]: Bad model when creating virtual printer #368

Closed
opened 2026-05-07 00:09:18 +02:00 by BreizhHardware · 33 comments

Originally created by @S3LL1G28 on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026).
Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/564

Originally assigned to: @maziggy on GitHub.

Bug Description

Hi ,

Big thanks for this wonderfull project ! !

I run a container image of bambuddy v0.2.1.1. I have followed your wiki to setup everything related to docker in networkmode: host.

I run on an lxc under promox with nested, keyctl.

My problem is when I create a virtual printer for my H2S i see x1c to H2S and asking about binding interface and have no choice of selecting interface.

I have created a second interface on this lxc which is on the same lan as my H2S.

I can get information about my real H2S for printer

Expected Behavior

Having a working virtual printer, with the capabilities to select network interface.

Steps to Reproduce

1- install a new bambuddy in networkmode host
2_ have a second physical interface
3- try to add a virtual printer after creating the real one

Printer Model

H2S

Bambuddy Version

0.2.2.1

Printer Firmware Version

01.01.02.00

Installation Method

Docker

Operating System

Linux (Ubuntu/Debian)

Relevant Logs / Support Package


Screenshots

Image

Additional Context

No response

Checklist

  • I have searched existing issues to ensure this bug hasn't already been reported
  • I am using the latest version of Bambuddy
  • My printer is set to LAN Only mode
  • My printer has Developer Mode enabled
Originally created by @S3LL1G28 on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026). Original GitHub issue: https://github.com/maziggy/bambuddy/issues/564 Originally assigned to: @maziggy on GitHub. ### Bug Description Hi , Big thanks for this wonderfull project ! ! I run a container image of bambuddy v0.2.1.1. I have followed your wiki to setup everything related to docker in networkmode: host. I run on an lxc under promox with nested, keyctl. My problem is when I create a virtual printer for my H2S i see x1c to H2S and asking about binding interface and have no choice of selecting interface. I have created a second interface on this lxc which is on the same lan as my H2S. I can get information about my real H2S for printer ### Expected Behavior Having a working virtual printer, with the capabilities to select network interface. ### Steps to Reproduce 1- install a new bambuddy in networkmode host 2_ have a second physical interface 3- try to add a virtual printer after creating the real one ### Printer Model H2S ### Bambuddy Version 0.2.2.1 ### Printer Firmware Version 01.01.02.00 ### Installation Method Docker ### Operating System Linux (Ubuntu/Debian) ### Relevant Logs / Support Package ```shell ``` ### Screenshots <img width="512" height="86" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dbab8be8-6ede-44ef-a076-9045a391e877" /> ### Additional Context _No response_ ### Checklist - [x] I have searched existing issues to ensure this bug hasn't already been reported - [x] I am using the latest version of Bambuddy - [x] My printer is set to LAN Only mode - [x] My printer has Developer Mode enabled
BreizhHardware 2026-05-07 00:09:18 +02:00
  • closed this issue
  • added the
    wontfix
    label
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

bambuddy-support-20260301-165930.zip

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980355977 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): [bambuddy-support-20260301-165930.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25663010/bambuddy-support-20260301-165930.zip)
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Bambuddy cannot find any interface!

"network": {
"interface_count": 0,
"interfaces": []
},

Show me the output of "ifconfig" from your host OS and your LXC config.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980365366 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Bambuddy cannot find any interface! "network": { "interface_count": 0, "interfaces": [] }, Show me the output of "ifconfig" from your host OS and your LXC config.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

 ip a 
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: veth0@if10: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether bc:24:11:da:29:1b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0
    inet 10.10.1.222/24 brd 10.10.1.255 scope global veth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::be24:11ff:feda:291b/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: br-5892bd49c133: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default 
    link/ether 9e:d3:a7:25:bd:52 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.18.0.1/16 brd 172.18.255.255 scope global br-5892bd49c133
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::9cd3:a7ff:fe25:bd52/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: br-42907c8c22f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default 
    link/ether fe:f9:9b:e3:d8:db brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.19.0.1/16 brd 172.19.255.255 scope global br-42907c8c22f1
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: docker0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default 
    link/ether 06:d4:a5:79:14:e0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
35: veth1@if36: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether bc:24:11:db:44:de brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0
    inet 10.10.1.225/24 scope global veth1
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::be24:11ff:fedb:44de/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
93: veth2fc6068@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default 
    link/ether 4e:0d:54:7d:da:d6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 1
    inet6 fe80::4c0d:54ff:fe7d:dad6/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
94: veth9b5d40a@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default 
    link/ether 3a:9f:68:d0:df:b2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 2
    inet6 fe80::389f:68ff:fed0:dfb2/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
95: veth6d0aaac@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default 
    link/ether 76:53:9c:41:76:7c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 3
    inet6 fe80::7453:9cff:fe41:767c/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
96: vethfbbb543@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default 
    link/ether 4e:0f:81:44:3d:be brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 4
    inet6 fe80::4c0f:81ff:fe44:3dbe/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
97: veth278513c@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default 
    link/ether 4a:91:e0:4d:2a:fe brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 5
    inet6 fe80::4891:e0ff:fe4d:2afe/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

my lxc conf:

arch: amd64
cmode: tty
console: 1
cores: 2
cpuunits: 1024
features: fuse=1,keyctl=1,mount=nfs,nesting=1
hostname: infra-svc
memory: 3000
nameserver: 10.10.1.1
net0: name=veth0,bridge=vmbr0,gw=10.10.1.1,hwaddr=BC:24:11:DA:29:1B,ip=10.10.1.222/24,type=veth
net1: name=veth1,bridge=vmbr0,gw=10.10.1.1,hwaddr=BC:24:11:DB:44:DE,ip=10.10.1.225/24,type=veth
onboot: 1
ostype: ubuntu
protection: 0
rootfs: local-lvm:vm-2000-disk-0,size=50G
searchdomain: gil-yan.net
swap: 1024
template: 0
tty: 2

I got other services on it but no port conflicts

edit: update github format

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980374092 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): ``` ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 ::1/128 scope host noprefixroute valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: veth0@if10: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether bc:24:11:da:29:1b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0 inet 10.10.1.222/24 brd 10.10.1.255 scope global veth0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::be24:11ff:feda:291b/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 3: br-5892bd49c133: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default link/ether 9e:d3:a7:25:bd:52 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.18.0.1/16 brd 172.18.255.255 scope global br-5892bd49c133 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::9cd3:a7ff:fe25:bd52/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 4: br-42907c8c22f1: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default link/ether fe:f9:9b:e3:d8:db brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.19.0.1/16 brd 172.19.255.255 scope global br-42907c8c22f1 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 5: docker0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default link/ether 06:d4:a5:79:14:e0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 35: veth1@if36: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether bc:24:11:db:44:de brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0 inet 10.10.1.225/24 scope global veth1 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::be24:11ff:fedb:44de/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 93: veth2fc6068@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default link/ether 4e:0d:54:7d:da:d6 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 1 inet6 fe80::4c0d:54ff:fe7d:dad6/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 94: veth9b5d40a@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default link/ether 3a:9f:68:d0:df:b2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 2 inet6 fe80::389f:68ff:fed0:dfb2/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 95: veth6d0aaac@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default link/ether 76:53:9c:41:76:7c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 3 inet6 fe80::7453:9cff:fe41:767c/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 96: vethfbbb543@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default link/ether 4e:0f:81:44:3d:be brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 4 inet6 fe80::4c0f:81ff:fe44:3dbe/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 97: veth278513c@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-5892bd49c133 state UP group default link/ether 4a:91:e0:4d:2a:fe brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 5 inet6 fe80::4891:e0ff:fe4d:2afe/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever ``` my lxc conf: ```#Managed by Terraform arch: amd64 cmode: tty console: 1 cores: 2 cpuunits: 1024 features: fuse=1,keyctl=1,mount=nfs,nesting=1 hostname: infra-svc memory: 3000 nameserver: 10.10.1.1 net0: name=veth0,bridge=vmbr0,gw=10.10.1.1,hwaddr=BC:24:11:DA:29:1B,ip=10.10.1.222/24,type=veth net1: name=veth1,bridge=vmbr0,gw=10.10.1.1,hwaddr=BC:24:11:DB:44:DE,ip=10.10.1.225/24,type=veth onboot: 1 ostype: ubuntu protection: 0 rootfs: local-lvm:vm-2000-disk-0,size=50G searchdomain: gil-yan.net swap: 1024 template: 0 tty: 2 ``` I got other services on it but no port conflicts edit: update github format
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Sorry, I meant ifconfig from the container, Docker is running in.

Not sure if keyctl could be an issue. Never used it.

Fact is, Bambuddy does need to find the LXC container interfaces, but doesn't.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980403641 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Sorry, I meant ifconfig from the container, Docker is running in. Not sure if keyctl could be an issue. Never used it. Fact is, Bambuddy does need to find the LXC container interfaces, but doesn't.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Sorry, if i misunderstood but ifconfig is not there.neither ip a

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980419369 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Sorry, if i misunderstood but ifconfig is not there.neither ip a
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Just for your information i try on Kubernetes (even if it will not be used) and same error for virtual printer

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980423551 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Just for your information i try on Kubernetes (even if it will not be used) and same error for virtual printer
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

cat /proc/net/dev in container?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980434861 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): cat /proc/net/dev in container?
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

cat /proc/net/dev
Inter-|   Receive                                                |  Transmit
 face |bytes    packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes    packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed
    lo: 23720504  115885    0    0    0     0          0         0 23720504  115885    0    0    0     0       0          0
 veth0: 2694603857 7847000    0 1869    0     0          0         0 795154479 1471036    0    0    0     0       0          0
br-5892bd49c133: 785191896 1356501    0    0    0     0          0         0 331606918 1418749    0    0    0     0       0          0
br-42907c8c22f1:       0       0    0    0    0     0          0         0        0       0    0    0    0     0       0          0
docker0:       0       0    0    0    0     0          0         0        0       0    0    0    0     0       0          0
 veth1: 8801549   65289    0    0    0     0          0         0     5468      66    0    0    0     0       0          0
veth2fc6068:   17106     162    0    0    0     0          0         0    25478     232    0    0    0     0       0          0
veth9b5d40a:  172392      38    0    0    0     0          0         0     8470      64    0    0    0     0       0          0
veth6d0aaac:  245517     977    0    0    0     0          0         0   189929    1599    0    0    0     0       0          0
vethfbbb543:  363903    2545    0    0    0     0          0         0   523054    2103    0    0    0     0       0          0
veth278513c: 9311709   14998    0    0    0     0          0         0  8426001   14331    0    0    0     0       0          0
root@infra-svc:/app# 
<!-- gh-comment-id:3980439050 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): ``` cat /proc/net/dev Inter-| Receive | Transmit face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed lo: 23720504 115885 0 0 0 0 0 0 23720504 115885 0 0 0 0 0 0 veth0: 2694603857 7847000 0 1869 0 0 0 0 795154479 1471036 0 0 0 0 0 0 br-5892bd49c133: 785191896 1356501 0 0 0 0 0 0 331606918 1418749 0 0 0 0 0 0 br-42907c8c22f1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 docker0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 veth1: 8801549 65289 0 0 0 0 0 0 5468 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 veth2fc6068: 17106 162 0 0 0 0 0 0 25478 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 veth9b5d40a: 172392 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 8470 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 veth6d0aaac: 245517 977 0 0 0 0 0 0 189929 1599 0 0 0 0 0 0 vethfbbb543: 363903 2545 0 0 0 0 0 0 523054 2103 0 0 0 0 0 0 veth278513c: 9311709 14998 0 0 0 0 0 0 8426001 14331 0 0 0 0 0 0 root@infra-svc:/app# ```
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

I make some quick downgrade on kubernetes and found that 0.2.1b3 show me interface eth0

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980456415 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): I make some quick downgrade on kubernetes and found that 0.2.1b3 show me interface eth0
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

That's not going to work. Your container has no eth interface.

veth* interfaces are Docker/container virtual ethernet pairs. They're the point-to-point links between container network namespaces and Docker bridge networks. They're transient (created/destroyed with containers), have no meaningful routable IP from the host's perspective, and binding a Virtual Printer to one would be useless.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980458236 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): That's not going to work. Your container has no eth interface. veth* interfaces are Docker/container virtual ethernet pairs. They're the point-to-point links between container network namespaces and Docker bridge networks. They're transient (created/destroyed with containers), have no meaningful routable IP from the host's perspective, and binding a Virtual Printer to one would be useless.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

ok i will try to see how to change the name of interfaces => done and working with changing the name to eth1
But a bug persist independantly of interfaces. The virtual printer show x1c to H2s

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980463041 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): ok i will try to see how to change the name of interfaces => done and working with changing the name to eth1 But a bug persist independantly of interfaces. The virtual printer show x1c to H2s
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

What does "The virtual printer show x1c to H2s" mean? Show me a screenshot of the settings page.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980498745 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): What does "The virtual printer show x1c to H2s" mean? Show me a screenshot of the settings page.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Image

after the name we can see x1c = H2s

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980505388 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): <img width="1326" height="1025" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c5e729a2-c723-4464-b03d-e66243ac7fc8" /> after the name we can see x1c = H2s
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Stop! You are running an old version of Bambuddy! Please update to latest version.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980511878 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Stop! You are running an old version of Bambuddy! Please update to latest version.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

oh sure ! if it's that shame on me, i will check

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980513942 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): oh sure ! if it's that shame on me, i will check
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

docker compose ps bambuddy
NAME IMAGE COMMAND SERVICE CREATED STATUS PORTS
bambuddy ghcr.io/maziggy/bambuddy:0.2.1.1 "sh -c 'uvicorn back…" bambuddy 3 minutes ago Up About a minute (healthy)

I erase data too. and same problem

I was before in latest tag

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980523391 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): docker compose ps bambuddy NAME IMAGE COMMAND SERVICE CREATED STATUS PORTS bambuddy ghcr.io/maziggy/bambuddy:0.2.1.1 "sh -c 'uvicorn back…" bambuddy 3 minutes ago Up About a minute (healthy) I erase data too. and same problem I was before in latest tag
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

I have tested something and have a bachup of a previous try. I have the right interface. So before update it was ok.

how can i see in sqlite3 the backup version ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980527457 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): I have tested something and have a bachup of a previous try. I have the right interface. So before update it was ok. how can i see in sqlite3 the backup version ?
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

All good for the version I think.

H2S is what you selected under Target Printer?!

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980528251 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): All good for the version I think. H2S is what you selected under Target Printer?!
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

yes for sure, I have selected H2s

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980529699 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): yes for sure, I have selected H2s
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

I try to find a software to read sqlite from the backup in case of

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980530405 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): I try to find a software to read sqlite from the backup in case of
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Yes, you added a proxy for X1C but selcted the H2D as a target!

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980530783 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Yes, you added a proxy for X1C but selcted the H2D as a target!
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Image

no as you can see

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980533106 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): <img width="1326" height="1025" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/151708a5-5801-49e8-8030-38c316c1f9a0" /> no as you can see
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

tell me if you need i have now a tool to read sqlite db. i Open the one from backup to compare

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980536908 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): tell me if you need i have now a tool to read sqlite db. i Open the one from backup to compare
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

in my old backup i see O1S , in the backup from a fresh version i see in table virtual printers: 3DPrinter-X1-Carbon

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980544230 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): in my old backup i see O1S , in the backup from a fresh version i see in table virtual printers: 3DPrinter-X1-Carbon
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

See....the workflow for adding a virtual printer is

  • click add button
  • choose name and mode
  • click create
  • select mode proxy
  • select target printer

So, when your card shows

X1C <-> H2S

its equal to

<**_name_**> <-> <your selected printer>

So what happended? You entered X1C into the name field when creating the virtual printer.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980580899 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): See....the workflow for adding a virtual printer is - click add button - choose **_name_** and mode - click create - select mode proxy - select target printer So, when your card shows X1C <-> H2S its equal to ` <**_name_**> <-> <your selected printer> ` So what happended? You entered X1C into the name field when creating the virtual printer.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

I follow this logical sequence and if i put different name in name for example toto i have:

toto proxy x1c <->H2S.gil-yan.net

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980588034 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): I follow this logical sequence and if i put different name in name for example toto i have: toto proxy x1c <->H2S.gil-yan.net
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Ahhhhh.....wait!

Switch the VP mode and see what printer is selected for printer model. I think that's just a typo in frontend.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980597937 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Ahhhhh.....wait! Switch the VP mode and see what printer is selected for printer model. I think that's just a typo in frontend.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

i don't understand you VP mode ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980602126 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): i don't understand you VP mode ?
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

The virtual printer settings card has four modes Archive, Queue, Review and Proxy. You are now in proxy mode. Switch to any other mode and check which printer is selected as target printer.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980606817 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): The virtual printer settings card has four modes Archive, Queue, Review and Proxy. You are now in proxy mode. Switch to any other mode and check which printer is selected as target printer.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

AH ok i understand by going into archiver th model is asked an when go to proxy mode it stay.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980607673 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): AH ok i understand by going into archiver th model is asked an when go to proxy mode it stay.
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Which is correct, because the card is for the printer you specified when setting it up.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980609234 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Which is correct, because the card is for the printer you specified when setting it up.
Author
Owner

@S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

so it will be interesting to add a choice like archiver for the model . If others like me click directly they won't understand no ?

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980613400 --> @S3LL1G28 commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): so it will be interesting to add a choice like archiver for the model . If others like me click directly they won't understand no ?
Author
Owner

@maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026):

Sorry, don't know what you mean.

<!-- gh-comment-id:3980626062 --> @maziggy commented on GitHub (Mar 1, 2026): Sorry, don't know what you mean.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
starred/bambuddy-maziggy-1#368
No description provided.